↓ Skip to main content

Morphology-based phylogeny and revision of Prepusa and Senaea (Gentianaceae:Helieae) — rare endemics from eastern Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Kew Bulletin, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Morphology-based phylogeny and revision of Prepusa and Senaea (Gentianaceae:Helieae) — rare endemics from eastern Brazil
Published in
Kew Bulletin, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s12225-008-9030-1
Authors

Maria Fernanda Calió, José Rubens Pirani, Lena Struwe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 12%
Czechia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 74%
Environmental Science 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Kew Bulletin
#257
of 1,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,361
of 87,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kew Bulletin
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,091 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.