↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and course of affective psychoses: was Kraepelin right?

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Diagnosis and course of affective psychoses: was Kraepelin right?
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00406-008-2013-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jules Angst, Alex Gamma

Abstract

Kraepelin's basic attitude to the classification of psychoses was data-oriented and flexible. In his latter years he was close to revising his own celebrated dichotomy between manic-depressive insanity and dementia praecox in order to take account of a large group of intermediate psychoses, which today are called schizo-affective. His concept of a continuum from healthy to ill has stood the test of time and corresponds to modern epidemiological findings. Kraepelin's unitarian concept of manic-depressive insanity did not survive. It was differentiated and broken down into several subgroups, and a proportional diagnostic spectrum with a continuum from mania via bipolar disorders to depression has recently even been proposed. Bipolar disorders would in that case be comorbid disorders of mania plus depression. In contrast to Kraepelin's unitarian view the long-term prognosis of subgroups of mood disorders varies considerably. Overall it is nevertheless astonishing how much of Kraepelin's legacy has survived.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 9 16%
Student > Master 7 12%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 40%
Psychology 14 25%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#462
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,452
of 83,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.