↓ Skip to main content

Coal Bed Methane potentiality — Case studies from Umaria, Korba and Ib-valley coals, Son-Mahanadi Basin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Geological Society of India, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 124)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Coal Bed Methane potentiality — Case studies from Umaria, Korba and Ib-valley coals, Son-Mahanadi Basin
Published in
Journal of the Geological Society of India, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12594-010-0081-1
Authors

K. N. Singh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 32%
Researcher 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 54%
Chemistry 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Energy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2011.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Geological Society of India
#34
of 124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,295
of 93,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Geological Society of India
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them