↓ Skip to main content

Advances in Ureteral Stent Design and Materials

Overview of attention for article published in Current Urology Reports, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Advances in Ureteral Stent Design and Materials
Published in
Current Urology Reports, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11934-018-0779-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ali Mosayyebi, Costantino Manes, Dario Carugo, Bhaskar K. Somani

Abstract

There are three technological parameters that play a key role on the performance of an ideal stent. These are its material, design and surface coating. This article highlights some fundamental developments that took place in these three areas of stent's technology, in order to contribute to the identification of an ideal stent. In addition to technological developments concerning stent's material, design and surface coating, the flow dynamic performance of stents has recently attracted increasing attention. Notably, it has been postulated that the local flow field in a stent is correlated with the deposition of crystals and microorganisms. These findings could potentially revolutionise future stent's designs, and complement developments made on materials and coatings. The most relevant changes in materials, designs and surface coatings of ureteric stents are reviewed in this article. These are described in the context of a specific cause of stent's failure they aim to address, with a particular focus on encrustation and biofilm formation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Student > Master 14 8%
Other 12 7%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 63 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 23%
Engineering 28 17%
Materials Science 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Chemical Engineering 5 3%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 69 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,486,929
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Current Urology Reports
#247
of 594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,805
of 329,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Urology Reports
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.