↓ Skip to main content

Inequalities in child immunization coverage in Ghana: evidence from a decomposition analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Health Economics Review, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 495)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
Title
Inequalities in child immunization coverage in Ghana: evidence from a decomposition analysis
Published in
Health Economics Review, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13561-018-0193-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek Asuman, Charles Godfred Ackah, Ulrika Enemark

Abstract

Childhood vaccination has been promoted as a global intervention aimed at improving child survival and health, through the reduction of vaccine preventable deaths. However, there exist significant inequalities in achieving universal coverage of child vaccination among and within countries. In this paper, we examine rural-urban inequalities in child immunizations in Ghana. Using data from the recent two waves of the Ghana Demographic and Health Survey, we examine the probability that a child between 12 and 59 months receives the required vaccinations and proceed to decompose the sources of inequalities in the probability of full immunization between rural and urban areas. We find significant child-specific, maternal and household characteristics on a child's immunization status. The results show that children in rural areas are more likely to complete the required vaccinations. The direction and sources of inequalities in child immunizations have changed between the two survey waves. We find a pro-urban advantage in 2008 arising from differences in observed characteristics whilst a pro-rural advantage emerges in 2014 dominated by the differences in coefficients. Health system development and campaign efforts have focused on rural areas. There is a need to also specifically target vulnerable children in urban areas, to maintain focus on women empowerment and pay attention to children from high socio-economic households in less favourable economic times.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 290 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 18%
Student > Bachelor 48 17%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 5%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 107 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 67 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 12%
Social Sciences 17 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 121 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,967,369
of 25,350,078 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#32
of 495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,981
of 335,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,350,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them