| Title |
Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii using a novel bioreactor equipped with a spin filter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11814-007-5058-4 |
| Authors |
Jae Yong Jung, Taous Khan, Joong Kon Park, Ho Nam Chang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
#63
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,966
of 70,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.