| Title |
Effect of various carbon and nitrogen sources on cellulose synthesis by Acetobacter xylinum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1008958014270 |
| Authors |
K.V. Ramana, A. Tomar, Lokendra Singh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 189 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 19% |
| Researcher | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 19% |
| Engineering | 25 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 17 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#364
of 1,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,852
of 40,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,879 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.