↓ Skip to main content

Energy allocation and life history strategy of the desert isopod H. reaumuri

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Energy allocation and life history strategy of the desert isopod H. reaumuri
Published in
Oecologia, January 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf00540214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moshe Shachak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 7%
Canada 1 7%
Australia 1 7%
Unknown 12 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 27%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,674
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,674
of 27,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.