↓ Skip to main content

Modeling of the Process of Electric‐Discharge Sintering of Metal Powders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Modeling of the Process of Electric‐Discharge Sintering of Metal Powders
Published in
Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, May 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:joep.0000036510.38833.05
Authors

K. E. Belyavin, D. V. Min'ko, O. O. Kuznechik

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 56%
Materials Science 3 33%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics
#13
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,973
of 62,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them