↓ Skip to main content

The Ising decoder: reading out the activity of large neural ensembles

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computational Neuroscience, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Ising decoder: reading out the activity of large neural ensembles
Published in
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10827-011-0342-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael T. Schaub, Simon R. Schultz

Abstract

The Ising model has recently received much attention for the statistical description of neural spike train data. In this paper, we propose and demonstrate its use for building decoders capable of predicting, on a millisecond timescale, the stimulus represented by a pattern of neural activity. After fitting to a training dataset, the Ising decoder can be applied "online" for instantaneous decoding of test data. While such models can be fit exactly using Boltzmann learning, this approach rapidly becomes computationally intractable as neural ensemble size increases. We show that several approaches, including the Thouless-Anderson-Palmer (TAP) mean field approach from statistical physics, and the recently developed Minimum Probability Flow Learning (MPFL) algorithm, can be used for rapid inference of model parameters in large-scale neural ensembles. Use of the Ising model for decoding, unlike other problems such as functional connectivity estimation, requires estimation of the partition function. As this involves summation over all possible responses, this step can be limiting. Mean field approaches avoid this problem by providing an analytical expression for the partition function. We demonstrate these decoding techniques by applying them to simulated neural ensemble responses from a mouse visual cortex model, finding an improvement in decoder performance for a model with heterogeneous as opposed to homogeneous neural tuning and response properties. Our results demonstrate the practicality of using the Ising model to read out, or decode, spatial patterns of activity comprised of many hundreds of neurons.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
France 3 2%
Japan 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 113 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 29%
Researcher 30 23%
Student > Master 14 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 23%
Computer Science 19 15%
Neuroscience 17 13%
Physics and Astronomy 14 11%
Mathematics 9 7%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 12 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#68
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,127
of 113,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.