| Title |
Cyanobacteria: A potential biofertilizer for rice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Resonance, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02839213 |
| Authors |
Upasana Mishra, Sunil Pabbi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 10% |
| Engineering | 10 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 43 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Resonance
#50
of 256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,562
of 59,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resonance
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 256 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.