| Title |
Carbon Aerogels as Electrode Material in Supercapacitors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Porous Materials, October 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1009629423578 |
| Authors |
U. Fischer, R. Saliger, V. Bock, R. Petricevic, J. Fricke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 28 | 29% |
| Materials Science | 16 | 16% |
| Engineering | 9 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Porous Materials
#16
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,311
of 28,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Porous Materials
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them