↓ Skip to main content

A conceptual replication and extension of erving goffman's study of gender advertisements

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, August 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
A conceptual replication and extension of erving goffman's study of gender advertisements
Published in
Sex Roles, August 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00289848
Authors

Penny Belknap, Wilbert M. Leonard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 10%
Psychology 6 10%
Linguistics 3 5%
Design 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,577,096
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#1,109
of 2,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,862
of 17,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them