↓ Skip to main content

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG-CoA) reductases

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
293 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
Title
The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG-CoA) reductases
Published in
Genome Biology, November 2004
DOI 10.1186/gb-2004-5-11-248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon A Friesen, Victor W Rodwell

Abstract

The enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase catalyzes the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate, a four-electron oxidoreduction that is the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of cholesterol and other isoprenoids. The enzyme is found in eukaryotes and prokaryotes; and phylogenetic analysis has revealed two classes of HMG-CoA reductase, the Class I enzymes of eukaryotes and some archaea and the Class II enzymes of eubacteria and certain other archaea. Three-dimensional structures of the catalytic domain of HMG-CoA reductases from humans and from the bacterium Pseudomonas mevalonii, in conjunction with site-directed mutagenesis studies, have revealed details of the mechanism of catalysis. The reaction catalyzed by human HMG-CoA reductase is a target for anti-hypercholesterolemic drugs (statins), which are intended to lower cholesterol levels in serum. Eukaryotic forms of the enzyme are anchored to the endoplasmic reticulum, whereas the prokaryotic enzymes are soluble. Probably because of its critical role in cellular cholesterol homeostasis, mammalian HMG-CoA reductase is extensively regulated at the transcriptional, translational, and post-translational levels.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 321 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 19%
Student > Bachelor 63 19%
Student > Master 44 13%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 36 11%
Unknown 84 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 9%
Chemistry 29 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 4%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 90 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,655,583
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,104
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,221
of 74,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.