↓ Skip to main content

Placental pathology: its impact on explaining prenatal and perinatal death

Overview of attention for article published in Virchows Archiv, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Placental pathology: its impact on explaining prenatal and perinatal death
Published in
Virchows Archiv, May 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00428-004-1032-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Stallmach, Gundula Hebisch

Abstract

This review considers six main situations in which pathologists are expected to report and interpret placental messages for obstetricians, neonatologists and, indirectly, parents: (1) abortion is the body's corrective response to the embryonic defect suggested by malformed chorionic villi; (2) infection causing chorionic villous inflammation is specific and haematogenous; pathogen identification is mandatory, in contrast to chorioamnionitis caused by increased local immunosuppression allowing indiscriminate bacterial entry; (3) prematurity and (4) intrauterine growth restriction are often associated with pregnancy-specific disease (pre-eclampsia) or pre-existing maternal conditions (systemic lupus); parental studies may improve outcome in subsequent pregnancies; (5) intrauterine death near term is often due to placental dysmaturity featuring a severely reduced number of syncytiocapillary membranes; it accounts for the death in utero of 3 in 1000 pregnancies; detection helps to minimise recurrence in subsequent pregnancies; (6) twins are best confirmed as monozygous by the absence of chorionic tissue in the dividing membranes; most monochorionic twins have vascular connections whose detailed analysis is requested only if there are inter-twin differences in growth and colour. From a formal point of view, many more bits of pathology than discussed in this review can be found in placentas and, with the advances in ultrasonography, might even be seen prior to birth. The extent of such a disturbance might ultimately affect fetal growth, which is amenable to prenatal detection offering the chances for an appropriate management. In contrast, dysmaturity is a great challenge as no predictive tests are as yet available.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Brazil 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 33 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Professor 5 13%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Virchows Archiv
#509
of 2,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,064
of 63,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virchows Archiv
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.