↓ Skip to main content

Acupuncture for tension-type headache: a multicentre, sham-controlled, patient-and observer-blinded, randomised trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Headache and Pain, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for tension-type headache: a multicentre, sham-controlled, patient-and observer-blinded, randomised trial
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10194-007-0416-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heinz G. Endres, Gabriele Böwing, Hans-Christoph Diener, Stefan Lange, Christoph Maier, Albrecht Molsberger, Michael Zenz, Andrew J. Vickers, Martin Tegenthoff

Abstract

Acupuncture treatment is frequently sought for tension-type headache (TTH), but there is conflicting evidence as to its effectiveness. This randomised, controlled, multicentre, patient-and observer-blinded trial was carried out in 122 outpatient practices in Germany on 409 patients with TTH, defined as > or =10 headache days per month of which < or =1 included migraine symptoms. Interventions were verum acupuncture according to the practice of traditional Chinese medicine or sham acupuncture consisting of superficial needling at nonacupuncture points. Acupuncture was administered by physicians with specialist acupuncture training. Ten 30-min sessions were given over a six-week period, with additional sessions available for partial response. Response was defined as >50% reduction in headache days/month at six months and no use of excluded concomitant medication or other therapies. In the intent-to-treat analysis (all 409 patients), 33% of verum patients and 27% of sham controls (p=0.18) were classed as responders. Verum was superior to sham for most secondary endpoints, including headache days (1.8 fewer; 95% CI 0.6, 3.0; p=0.004) and the International Headache Society response criterion (66% vs. 55% response, risk difference 12%, 95% CI: 2%-21%; p=0.024).). The relative risk on the primary and secondary response criterion was very similar ( approximately 0.8); the difference in statistical significance may be due to differences in event rate. TTH improves after acupuncture treatment. However, the degree to which treatment benefits depend on psychological compared to physiological effects and the degree to which any physiological effects depend on needle placement and insertion depth are unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 167 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 27%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 36 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,179,309
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#115
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,209
of 77,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.