↓ Skip to main content

A posttraumatic pseudoaneurysm of the left radial artery as a result of a stab wound in an 8-year-old girl

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
A posttraumatic pseudoaneurysm of the left radial artery as a result of a stab wound in an 8-year-old girl
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12024-018-9975-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Goran Djuricic, Zorica Milosevic, Tijana Radovic, Ivana Dasic, Djordje Alempijevic, Jelena Sopta

Abstract

Pseudoaneurysms arise from a disruption of arterial wall continuity and are most commonly related to a penetrating trauma, an arterial wall inflammation or iatrogenic causes. They differ from real aneurysms due to a lack of one or more layers of the arterial wall. The frequency of peripheral artery pseudoaneurysms in the upper extremities is less than in the lower extremities and its most common cause is a gunshot or a stab wound. The risk of a rupture is higher than in true aneurysms due to a lack of wall layers, therefore requiring surgical treatment in most cases. Here we describe an unusual case of an 8-year-old girl who presented to the emergency department complaining of swelling and pain in her left distal forearm. One month before admission she experienced a penetrating trauma in the same area due to a self inflicted stab wound. After clinical and duplex ultrasonography evaluation the tumefaction proved to be a posttraumatic pseudoaneurysm of the left radial artery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Librarian 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Psychology 2 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#16,454,538
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#407
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,627
of 332,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.