↓ Skip to main content

Reinier De Graaf (1641–1673) and the Graafian follicle

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecological Surgery, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 157)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Reinier De Graaf (1641–1673) and the Graafian follicle
Published in
Gynecological Surgery, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10397-009-0466-6
Authors

M. Thiery

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Gynecological Surgery
#39
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,976
of 171,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecological Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them