↓ Skip to main content

An injectable cross-linked scaffold for nucleus pulposus regeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Materials, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An injectable cross-linked scaffold for nucleus pulposus regeneration
Published in
Clinical Materials, October 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Damien O. Halloran, Sibylle Grad, Martin Stoddart, Peter Dockery, Mauro Alini, Abhay S. Pandit

Abstract

Incorporation of scaffolds has long been recognized as a critical element in most tissue engineering strategies. However with regard to intervertebral disc tissue engineering, the use of a scaffold containing the principal extracellular matrix components of native disc tissue (i.e. collagen type II, aggrecan and hyaluronan) has not been investigated. In this study the behavior of bovine nucleus pulposus cells that were seeded within non-cross-linked and enzymatically cross-linked, atelocollagen type II based scaffolds containing varying concentrations of aggrecan and hyaluronan was investigated. Cross-linking atelocollagen type II based scaffolds did not cause any negative effects on cell viability or cell proliferation over the 7-day culture period. The cross-linked scaffolds retained the highest proteoglycan synthesis rate and the lowest elution of sulfated glycosaminoglycan into the surrounding medium. From confined compression testing and volume reduction measurements, it was seen that the cross-linked scaffolds provided a more stable structure for the cells compared to the non-cross-linked scaffolds. The results of this study indicate that the enzymatically cross-linked, composite collagen-hyaluronan scaffold shows the most potential for developing an injectable cell-seeded scaffold for nucleus pulposus treatment in degenerated intervertebral discs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 31%
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 36 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 15%
Materials Science 14 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 15 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Materials
#2,298
of 10,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,246
of 89,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Materials
#17
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.