↓ Skip to main content

Heat-transfer model for the acheson process

Overview of attention for article published in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Heat-transfer model for the acheson process
Published in
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, June 2001
DOI 10.1007/s11661-001-0220-9
Authors

G. S. Gupta, P. Vasanth Kumar, V. R. Rudolph, M. Gupta

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 11 31%
Engineering 5 14%
Chemistry 4 11%
Chemical Engineering 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
#157
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,498
of 40,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them