| Title |
From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of International Business Studies, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1057/jibs.2009.88 |
| Authors |
Sea-Jin Chang, Arjen van Witteloostuijn, Lorraine Eden |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,056 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 21 | 1% |
| Germany | 11 | <1% |
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Belgium | 4 | <1% |
| Peru | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 22 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1973 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 577 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 263 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 229 | 11% |
| Researcher | 111 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 100 | 5% |
| Other | 376 | 18% |
| Unknown | 400 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 961 | 47% |
| Social Sciences | 226 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 94 | 5% |
| Psychology | 70 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 58 | 3% |
| Other | 163 | 8% |
| Unknown | 484 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2017.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Business Studies
#227
of 1,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,927
of 179,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Business Studies
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.