↓ Skip to main content

Radiogenomics Predicting Tumor Responses to Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Radiation Oncology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiogenomics Predicting Tumor Responses to Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer
Published in
Seminars in Radiation Oncology, July 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.semradonc.2010.01.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amit K. Das, Marcus H. Bell, Chaitanya S. Nirodi, Michael D. Story, John D. Minna

Abstract

The recently developed ability to interrogate genome-wide data arrays has provided invaluable insights into the molecular pathogenesis of lung cancer. These data have also provided information for developing targeted therapy in lung cancer patients based on the identification of cancer-specific vulnerabilities and set the stage for molecular biomarkers that provide information on clinical outcome and response to treatment. In addition, there are now large panels of lung cancer cell lines, both non-small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer, that have distinct chemotherapy and radiation response phenotypes. We anticipate that the integration of molecular data with therapy response data will allow for the generation of biomarker signatures that predict response to therapy. These signatures will need to be validated in clinical studies, at first retrospective analyses and then prospective clinical trials, to show that the use of these biomarkers can aid in predicting patient outcomes (eg, in the case of radiation therapy for local control and survival). This review highlights recent advances in molecular profiling of tumor responses to radiotherapy and identifies challenges and opportunities in developing molecular biomarker signatures for predicting radiation response for individual patients with lung cancer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Spain 2 2%
Unknown 77 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 22%
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Master 11 13%
Other 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Engineering 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Computer Science 6 7%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Radiation Oncology
#175
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,923
of 103,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Radiation Oncology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them