| Title |
Microwave pyrolysis of cellulosic materials for the production of anhydrosugars
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00767906 |
| Authors |
Masakatsu Miura, Harumi Kaga, Takashi Yoshida, Koji Ando |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 26% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 10 | 26% |
| Engineering | 6 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,697,128
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#19
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,152
of 124,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them