| Title |
Incisor Schmelzmuster Diversity in South America's Oldest Rodent Fauna and Early Caviomorph History
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mammalian Evolution, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10914-005-6968-8 |
| Authors |
Thomas Martin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 8% |
| Chile | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 53% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#233
of 434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,981
of 146,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.