↓ Skip to main content

Bing–Neel syndrome: an illustrative case and a comprehensive review of the published literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Bing–Neel syndrome: an illustrative case and a comprehensive review of the published literature
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11060-009-9968-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roneil G. Malkani, Martin Tallman, Numa Gottardi-Littell, William Karpus, Laura Marszalek, Daina Variakojis, Bruce Kaden, Matthew Walker, Robert M. Levy, Jeffrey J. Raizer

Abstract

Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a chronic lymphoproliferative disorder within the spectrum of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma characterized by proliferation of plasma cells, small lymphocytes, and plasmacytoid lymphocytes. Central nervous system involvement is very rare (Bing-Neel [BN] syndrome). We present the case of a 62-year-old woman previously diagnosed with WM who presented with Bing-Neel syndrome and review the published literature which consists of only case reports. We performed a Medline search using the terms "Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia and central nervous system" and "Bing-Neel" collecting data on presentation, evaluation, treatment, and outcome and summarizing these findings in the largest pooled series to date. Central nervous system manifestations are localization related. Serum laboratory testing reflects systemic disease. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis may show lymphocytic pleocytosis, elevated protein, and IgM kappa or lambda light chain restriction; cytology results are variable. Imaging is frequently abnormal. Biopsy confirms the diagnosis. Treatment data are limited, but responses are seen with radiation and/or chemotherapy. BN syndrome is a very rare complication of WM that should be considered in patients with neurologic symptoms and a history of WM. Treatment should be initiated as responses do occur that may improve quality of life and extend it when limited or no active systemic disease is present.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 24%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,038,354
of 24,492,652 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#911
of 3,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,204
of 115,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,492,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.