↓ Skip to main content

Modeling heavy-tailed, skewed and peaked uncertainty phenomena with bounded support

Overview of attention for article published in Statistical Methods & Applications, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Modeling heavy-tailed, skewed and peaked uncertainty phenomena with bounded support
Published in
Statistical Methods & Applications, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10260-011-0173-0
Authors

C. B. García, J. García Pérez, J. R. van Dorp

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 9%
New Zealand 1 9%
Unknown 9 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Professor 2 18%
Librarian 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 27%
Mathematics 2 18%
Physics and Astronomy 2 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Statistical Methods & Applications
#17
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,522
of 125,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistical Methods & Applications
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them