| Title |
Use of oligonucleotide fingerprinting and faecal DNA in identifying the distribution of the Chinese tiger (Panthera tigris amoyensis Hilzheimer)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1023693613608 |
| Authors |
Qiu-Hong Wan, Sheng-Guo Fang, Guo-Fu Chen, Zhang-Ming Wang, Ping Ding, Mu-Yuan Zhu, Kong-Shou Chen, Jiu-Hua Yu, Yue-Ping Zhao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 4% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Czechia | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 147 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 109 | 64% |
| Environmental Science | 36 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,179
of 2,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,619
of 53,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.