↓ Skip to main content

Possible traces of feeding by beetles in coniferophyte wood from the Kazanian of the Kama River basin

Overview of attention for article published in Paleontological Journal, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Possible traces of feeding by beetles in coniferophyte wood from the Kazanian of the Kama River basin
Published in
Paleontological Journal, September 2010
DOI 10.1134/s0031030110040131
Authors

S. V. Naugolnykh, A. G. Ponomarenko

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Paleontological Journal
#138
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,065
of 94,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paleontological Journal
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.