↓ Skip to main content

Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation: chronic preclinical evidence for renal artery safety

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
76 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation: chronic preclinical evidence for renal artery safety
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00392-011-0346-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marian K. Rippy, Denise Zarins, Neil C. Barman, Andrew Wu, Keith L. Duncan, Christopher K. Zarins

Abstract

Renal sympathetic hyperactivity is associated with hypertension, a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Renal sympathetic denervation via the Symplicity Catheter System has been shown to decrease blood pressure by 33/11 mmHg by 6 months, with no radiofrequency (RF)-related adverse sequelae visible by CT/MR angiography or renal duplex ultrasound 6 months after the procedure. Here, we present preclinical work predating those clinical results. We performed therapeutic renal sympathetic denervation in a swine animal model to characterize the vascular safety and healing response 6 months after renal denervation therapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 75 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Other 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 65%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,835,644
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#183
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,715
of 120,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.