↓ Skip to main content

Community vs. Clinic-Based Modular Treatment of Children with Early-Onset ODD or CD: A Clinical Trial with 3-Year Follow-Up

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Community vs. Clinic-Based Modular Treatment of Children with Early-Onset ODD or CD: A Clinical Trial with 3-Year Follow-Up
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10802-009-9303-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Kolko, Lorah D. Dorn, Oscar G. Bukstein, Dustin Pardini, Elizabeth A. Holden, Jonathan Hart

Abstract

This study examines the treatment outcomes of 139, 6-11 year-old, clinically referred boys and girls diagnosed with Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) or Conduct Disorder (CD) who were randomly assigned to a modular-based treatment protocol that was applied by research study clinicians either in the community (COMM) or a clinic office (CLINIC). To examine normative comparisons, a matched sample of 69 healthy control children was included. Multiple informants completed diagnostic interviews and self-reports at six assessment timepoints (pretreatment to 3-year follow-up) to evaluate changes in the child's behavioral and emotional problems, psychopathic features, functional impairment, diagnostic status, and service involvement. Using HLM and logistic regression models, COMM and CLINIC showed significant and comparable improvements on all outcomes. By 3-year follow-up, 36% of COMM and 47% of CLINIC patients no longer met criteria for either ODD or CD, and 48% and 57% of the children in these two respective conditions had levels of parent-rated externalizing behavior problems in the normal range. We discuss the nature and implications of these novel findings regarding the role of treatment context or setting for the treatment and long-term outcome of behavior disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 169 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 20%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 35 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 91 51%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 42 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,453
of 2,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,574
of 111,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.