↓ Skip to main content

Defining the limits of the North Korean Human Rights Act: A security and legal perspective

Overview of attention for article published in East Asia, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 184)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Defining the limits of the North Korean Human Rights Act: A security and legal perspective
Published in
East Asia, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/bf03179659
Authors

Jaeho Hwang, Kim Jasper

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from East Asia
#45
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,204
of 160,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from East Asia
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.