↓ Skip to main content

Attention and executive functions computer training for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): results from a randomized, controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
Title
Attention and executive functions computer training for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): results from a randomized, controlled trial
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00787-018-1151-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aida Bikic, James F. Leckman, Torben Ø. Christensen, Niels Bilenberg, Søren Dalsgaard

Abstract

Multicenter randomized clinical superiority single-blind trial investigated the effect of a computer training program targeting multiple cognitive functions. Seventy children with ADHD, aged 6-13, were randomized to intervention or control group. The intervention group used ACTIVATE™ for 8 weeks and both groups received treatment as usual and were assessed in regard to cognitive functions, symptoms, behavioral and functional outcome measures after 8, 12 and 24 weeks. There was no significant effect on the primary outcome, sustained attention (β = - 0.047; CI - 0.247 to 0.153) or the secondary outcomes [parent-rated ADHD-RS, β = - 0.037; CI (- 0.224 to 0.150); teacher-rated-ADHD-RS, β = 0.093; CI (- 0.107 to 0.294); parent-rated-BRIEF, β = - 0.119; CI (- 0.307 to 0.069); and teacher-rated-BRIEF, β = 0.136; CI (- 0.048 to 0.322)]. This multicenter randomized clinical trial found no significant beneficial effects of cognitive training using the computer program ACTIVATE on the primary or secondary outcome measures in children with ADHD. Nevertheless, our study was likely underpowered to detect small to moderate changes.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01752530, date of registration: December 10, 2012.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Researcher 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 104 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 7%
Neuroscience 17 6%
Social Sciences 15 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 110 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2019.
All research outputs
#13,757,137
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#1,074
of 1,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,372
of 329,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#21
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.