↓ Skip to main content

Digital Humanities Within a Global Context: Creating Borderlands of Localized Expression

Overview of attention for article published in Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Digital Humanities Within a Global Context: Creating Borderlands of Localized Expression
Published in
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40647-018-0224-0
Authors

Amy E. Earhart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 21%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 29%
Computer Science 2 14%
Linguistics 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,851,325
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
#41
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,541
of 329,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.