↓ Skip to main content

Joint pricing, inventory, and preservation decisions for deteriorating items with stochastic demand and promotional efforts

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Engineering International, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Joint pricing, inventory, and preservation decisions for deteriorating items with stochastic demand and promotional efforts
Published in
Journal of Industrial Engineering International, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40092-018-0265-7
Authors

Hardik N. Soni, Ashaba D. Chauhan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 42%
Mathematics 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,504,780
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Engineering International
#7
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,485
of 331,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Engineering International
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them