| Title |
Conservation genetic assessment of the critically endangered Julimes pupfish, Cyprinodon julimes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-013-0548-x |
| Authors |
Evan W. Carson, Mauricio De la Maza-Benignos, María de Lourdes Lozano-Vilano, Lilia Vela-Valladares, Iris Banda-Villanueva, Thomas F. Turner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,697,128
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#280
of 1,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,842
of 215,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.