↓ Skip to main content

Imagination inflation: A statistical artifact of regression toward the mean

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, July 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Imagination inflation: A statistical artifact of regression toward the mean
Published in
Memory & Cognition, July 2001
DOI 10.3758/bf03200473
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathy Pezdek, Rebecca M. Eddy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 36 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 63%
Arts and Humanities 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,705,696
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#496
of 1,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,061
of 39,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.