↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomic study of Favolus and Neofavolus gen. nov. segregated from Polyporus (Basidiomycota, Polyporales)

Overview of attention for article published in Fungal Diversity, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Taxonomic study of Favolus and Neofavolus gen. nov. segregated from Polyporus (Basidiomycota, Polyporales)
Published in
Fungal Diversity, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13225-012-0213-6
Authors

Kozue Sotome, Yasunori Akagi, Su See Lee, Noemia K. Ishikawa, Tsutomu Hattori

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 55%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Diversity
#107
of 269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,302
of 183,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Diversity
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.