↓ Skip to main content

An experimental field test of host-finding mechanisms in a Caribbean gnathiid isopod

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
An experimental field test of host-finding mechanisms in a Caribbean gnathiid isopod
Published in
Marine Biology, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00227-011-1631-9
Authors

Paul C. Sikkel, Whitney T. Sears, Ben Weldon, Ben C. Tuttle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
Mexico 1 3%
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 32 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 24%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 57%
Environmental Science 7 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,239
of 3,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,685
of 184,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.