↓ Skip to main content

TCP Transcription Factors Predate the Emergence of Land Plants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
TCP Transcription Factors Predate the Emergence of Land Plants
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00239-006-0174-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivier Navaud, Patrick Dabos, Elodie Carnus, Dominique Tremousaygue, Christine Hervé

Abstract

TCP proteins are plant-specific transcription factors identified so far only in angiosperms and shown to be involved in specifying plant morphologies. However, the functions of these proteins remain largely unknown. Our study is the first phylogenetic analysis comparing the TCP genes from higher and lower plants, and it dates the emergence of the TCP family to before the split of the Zygnemophyta. EST database analysis and CODEHOP PCR amplification revealed TCP genes in basal land plant genomes and also in their close freshwater algal relatives. Based on an extensive survey of TCP genes, families of TCP proteins were characterized in the Arabidopsis thaliana, poplar, rice, club-moss, and moss genomes. The phylogenetic trees indicate a continuous expansion of the TCP family during the diversification of the Phragmoplastophyta and a similar degree of expansion in several angiosperm lineages. TCP paralogues were identified in all genomes studied, and Ks values indicate that TCP genes expanded during genome duplication events. MEME and SIMPLE analyses detected conserved motifs and low-complexity regions, respectively, outside of the TCP domain, which reinforced the previous description of a "mosaic" structure of TCP proteins.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Finland 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 158 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 24%
Researcher 40 23%
Student > Master 19 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 5%
Engineering 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 23 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#450
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,801
of 70,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.