↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of depression and anxiety among undergraduate university students in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
458 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of depression and anxiety among undergraduate university students in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0723-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

James January, Munyaradzi Madhombiro, Shalote Chipamaunga, Sunanda Ray, Alfred Chingono, Melanie Abas

Abstract

Depression and anxiety symptoms are reported to be common among university students in many regions of the world and impact on quality of life and academic attainment. The extent of the problem of depression and anxiety among students in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is largely unknown. This paper details methods for a systematic review that will be conducted to explore the prevalence, antecedents, consequences, and treatments for depression and anxiety among undergraduate university students in LMICs. Studies reporting primary data on common mental disorders among students in universities and colleges within LMICs will be included. Quality assessment of retrieved articles will be conducted using four Joanna Briggs critical appraisal checklists for prevalence, randomized control/pseudo-randomized trials, descriptive case series, and comparable cohort/case control. Meta-analysis of the prevalence of depression and anxiety will be conducted using a random effects model which will generate pooled prevalence with their respective 95% confidence intervals. The results from this systematic review will help in informing and guiding healthcare practitioners, planners, and policymakers on the burden of common mental disorders in university students in LMICs and of appropriate and feasible interventions aimed at reducing the burden of psychological morbidity among them. The results will also point to gaps in research and help set priorities for future enquiries. PROSPERO CRD42017064148.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 458 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 76 17%
Student > Master 46 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Student > Postgraduate 19 4%
Other 69 15%
Unknown 196 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 15%
Psychology 61 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 10%
Social Sciences 15 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 2%
Other 63 14%
Unknown 198 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,675,605
of 24,696,958 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#475
of 2,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,036
of 334,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#15
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,696,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.