↓ Skip to main content

A Model Capturing Ethics and Executive Compensation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
A Model Capturing Ethics and Executive Compensation
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, December 2003
DOI 10.1023/b:busi.0000004589.34756.8a
Authors

Waymond Rodgers, Susana Gago

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 9 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Lecturer 5 8%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 30 51%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 8%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Computer Science 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,338
of 3,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,085
of 142,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.