↓ Skip to main content

Rectal cooling test in the differentiation beteen constipation due to rectal inertia and anismus

Overview of attention for article published in Techniques in Coloproctology, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Rectal cooling test in the differentiation beteen constipation due to rectal inertia and anismus
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10151-007-0323-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Shafik, I. Shafik, O. El Sibai, A. A. Shafik

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Other 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 71%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#694
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,659
of 78,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them