You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of Training in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis of Design and Evaluation Features
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Psychology, April 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.234 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Winfred Arthur, Winston Bennett, Pamela S. Edens, Suzanne T. Bell |
| Abstract |
The authors used meta-analytic procedures to examine the relationship between specified training design and evaluation features and the effectiveness of training in organizations. Results of the meta-analysis revealed training effectiveness sample-weighted mean ds of 0.60 (k = 15, N = 936) for reaction criteria, 0.63 (k = 234, N = 15,014) for learning criteria, 0.62 (k = 122, N = 15,627) for behavioral criteria, and 0.62 (k = 26, N = 1,748) for results criteria. These results suggest a medium to large effect size for organizational training. In addition, the training method used, the skill or task characteristic trained, and the choice of evaluation criteria were related to the effectiveness of training programs. Limitations of the study along with suggestions for future research are discussed. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,980 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | <1% |
| Germany | 6 | <1% |
| India | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 3 | <1% |
| Russia | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 23 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1898 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 446 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 383 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 217 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 161 | 8% |
| Researcher | 106 | 5% |
| Other | 355 | 18% |
| Unknown | 312 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 608 | 31% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 482 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 257 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 45 | 2% |
| Engineering | 44 | 2% |
| Other | 197 | 10% |
| Unknown | 347 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,811,897
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#573
of 3,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,027
of 63,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them