| Title |
Taxonomic Impediment or Impediment to Taxonomy? A Commentary on Systematics and the Cybertaxonomic-Automation Paradigm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Biology, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11692-007-9011-6 |
| Authors |
Marcelo R. de Carvalho, Flávio A. Bockmann, Dalton S. Amorim, Carlos Roberto F. Brandão, Mário de Vivo, José L. de Figueiredo, Heraldo A. Britski, Mário C. C. de Pinna, Naércio A. Menezes, Fernando P. L. Marques, Nelson Papavero, Eliana M. Cancello, Jorge V. Crisci, John D. McEachran, Robert C. Schelly, John G. Lundberg, Anthony C. Gill, Ralf Britz, Quentin D. Wheeler, Melanie L. J. Stiassny, Lynne R. Parenti, Larry M. Page, Ward C. Wheeler, Julián Faivovich, Richard P. Vari, Lance Grande, Chris J. Humphries, Rob DeSalle, Malte C. Ebach, Gareth J. Nelson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 635 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 41 | 6% |
| United States | 12 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 2% |
| Unknown | 548 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 133 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 117 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 98 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 10% |
| Professor | 43 | 7% |
| Other | 131 | 21% |
| Unknown | 49 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 448 | 71% |
| Environmental Science | 43 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 32 | 5% |
| Unknown | 62 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Biology
#143
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,107
of 77,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Biology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.