↓ Skip to main content

Structural differences between the ready and unready oxidized states of [NiFe] hydrogenases

Overview of attention for article published in JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
301 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Structural differences between the ready and unready oxidized states of [NiFe] hydrogenases
Published in
JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00775-005-0632-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Volbeda, Lydie Martin, Christine Cavazza, Michaël Matho, Bart W. Faber, Winfried Roseboom, Simon P. J. Albracht, Elsa Garcin, Marc Rousset, Juan C. Fontecilla-Camps

Abstract

[NiFe] hydrogenases catalyze the reversible heterolytic cleavage of molecular hydrogen. Several oxidized, inactive states of these enzymes are known that are distinguishable by their very different activation properties. So far, the structural basis for this difference has not been understood because of lack of relevant crystallographic data. Here, we present the crystal structure of the ready Ni-B state of Desulfovibrio fructosovorans [NiFe] hydrogenase and show it to have a putative mu-hydroxo Ni-Fe bridging ligand at the active site. On the other hand, a new, improved refinement procedure of the X-ray diffraction data obtained for putative unready Ni-A/Ni-SU states resulted in a more elongated electron density for the bridging ligand, suggesting that it is a diatomic species. The slow activation of the Ni-A state, compared with the rapid activation of the Ni-B state, is therefore proposed to result from the different chemical nature of the ligands in the two oxidized species. Our results along with very recent electrochemical studies suggest that the diatomic ligand could be hydro-peroxide.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 31%
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 63 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Unspecified 3 2%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2012.
All research outputs
#7,863,403
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry
#189
of 664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,552
of 61,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 664 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.