↓ Skip to main content

Ethics for a brave new world

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Humanities, March 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Ethics for a brave new world
Published in
Journal of Medical Humanities, March 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf02276822
Authors

Brian H. Childs

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 80 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Lecturer 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 26 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 22 26%
Philosophy 15 18%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Computer Science 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 29 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Humanities
#207
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,470
of 24,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Humanities
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them