↓ Skip to main content

New direct thrombin inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Internal and Emergency Medicine, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
New direct thrombin inhibitors
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11739-009-0314-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Squizzato, Francesco Dentali, Luigi Steidl, Walter Ageno

Abstract

Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are a class of anticoagulants that bind selectively to thrombin and block its interaction with its substrates. Dabigatran etexilate and AZD0837, the new generation of DTIs, are now under intense development, and are potentially of great interest for internists. Dabigatran etexilate is a potent, non-peptidic small molecule that specifically and reversibly inhibits both free and clot-bound thrombin by binding to the active site of thrombin molecule. It has been already licensed in the European Union and in Canada for the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing hip- and knee-replacement surgery. Ongoing trials are evaluating its efficacy and safety for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, primary and secondary prevention of VTE, prevention of systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, and prevention of cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. AZD0837 is the prodrug of ARH06737, a potent, competitive, reversible inhibitor of free and fibrin-bound thrombin. At present, only limited, preclinical, phase I and phase II clinical data have been presented. The drug has now entered a phase III clinical program in the population of patients with atrial fibrillation. Their properties and the oral administration render these compounds, theoretically, more convenient than both vitamin K antagonist and low molecular weight heparins. However, only reports from clinical practice patterns over the next months and years will tell us how and when to use the new DTIs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Slovenia 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,832,538
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#248
of 970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,576
of 93,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them