↓ Skip to main content

A new species of woodpecker (Aves; Picidae) from the early Miocene of Saulcet (Allier, France)

Overview of attention for article published in Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
A new species of woodpecker (Aves; Picidae) from the early Miocene of Saulcet (Allier, France)
Published in
Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13358-011-0021-8
Authors

Vanesa L. De Pietri, Albrecht Manegold, Loïc Costeur, Gerald Mayr

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 5%
Chile 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Australia 1 5%
Unknown 18 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 41%
Researcher 6 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 59%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#99
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,283
of 132,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them