↓ Skip to main content

Worker policing and worker reproduction in Apis cerana

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Worker policing and worker reproduction in Apis cerana
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, September 2001
DOI 10.1007/s002650100376
Authors

Benjamin P. Oldroyd, Luke A. Halling, Gregory Good, Wandee Wattanachaiyingcharoen, Andrew B. Barron, Piyamas Nanork, Siriwat Wongsiri, Francis L. Ratnieks

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 2 2%
Denmark 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 80 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Professor 8 9%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 70%
Unspecified 3 3%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,389
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,431
of 39,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.