↓ Skip to main content

Moderne Methoden der Pflanzenanalyse

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, August 1966
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Moderne Methoden der Pflanzenanalyse
Published in
The Science of Nature, August 1966
DOI 10.1007/bf01185170
Authors

A. Trebst

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 17%
Chemistry 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#817
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#393
of 2,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them